14 - 09 - 2026

The Malinga Morass: Why Sri Lankan bowlers should embrace classical mechanics

I will admit my bias: I am an old-school cricketing aesthete.

Watching the Sri Lankan bowler, 19-year old Mithali Ayodhya Bandara sling the ball during the recent Women’s T20 Asia Cup—instantly inviting comparisons with “Lady Malinga”— made me write this.

The sling is thrilling in short bursts, but cricket’s history suggests that unusual, high-effort mechanics can place a demanding physical bill on the bowler. By contrast, the classical, upright action offers a model of repeatability and an economy – that has supported some of the game’s longest fast-bowling careers.

Having grown up watching legends like Kapil Dev, Richard Hadlee, Glenn McGrath, and James Anderson in more modern times, I feel that the game has become faster, more competitive and highly entertaining, but it seems to be losing a great craft worth preserving.

A fast bowler — especially a thinking one — gliding in towards the wicket and delivering a quick one is as much a pleasure to watch as a classy batsman driving through the covers. Michael Holding’s run-up was once, famously, called “poetry in motion”; no sling action, however lethal, has ever earned that description, and that gap is really what this piece is about.

It all goes back to Jeff ‘Thommo’ Thomson who supplied the modern template. His javelin-like, low-arm action produced a recorded 160.45 km/h delivery in 1975, among the fastest officially measured balls of the era.

While I am not claiming that his action caused the subsequent decline in his pace, it was sad to see that he — after an unfortunate on-field collision — rarely reached those searing peaks in fast bowling again.

As Wisden’s own account of his career notes, a shoulder injury sustained in that collision with Alan Turner at Adelaide in November 1976 disrupted him thereafter; he returned to play over 30 more Tests, but was never quite the same bowler.

Thomson, therefore, remains an important illustration — not of simple mechanical causation, but of how extreme pace and unusual physical demands can be difficult to sustain.

In the same breath, Dennis Lillee provides a useful contrast. After a serious back injury, he rebuilt his conditioning and technique and returned to bowl into his mid-thirties. His career does show how technical adjustment, rehabilitation and workload management can help preserve a fast bowler’s body.

In more modern days, Lasith Malinga perfected the sling as a white-ball weapon. His low-arm release made his yorkers and bouncers tough to read.

But his injury history demands an honest reading. A chronic right-knee condition, linked to an injury sustained in Australia in 2008, forced him to withdraw from Test cricket at 27 so that he could prolong his ODI and T20 career. He subsequently played 226 ODIs and 84 T20Is, meaning that the sling shortened his Test career specifically—perhaps not his career as a whole.

Sri Lanka may not be alone in producing sling or sling-adjacent outliers. Australia had Thomson and, decades later, Shaun Tait, whose action was explicitly reminiscent of Thomson’s. The West Indies had Fidel Edwards, whose low-arm action was compared with Malinga’s and whose career was later interrupted by serious back problems requiring surgery.

Pakistan’s Shoaib Akhtar offers a different cautionary example: he was not a true sling bowler, but his extreme, high-effort action was accompanied by recurrent knee, hamstring and back problems that repeatedly disrupted his availability.

However, what is distinctive about Sri Lanka is the emergence of several prominent sling-style bowlers across successive generations—from Malinga to Matheesha Pathirana and Nuwan Thushara. Now Mithali has started that tradition in women’s cricket.

I am not saying that Pathirana or Thushara are closely following Malinga’s career trajectory, but Sri Lankan cricket seems to developing or encouraging a lineage of sling and sling-adjacent bowlers.

Set against these examples is cricket’s other ledger. Greats like Kapil Dev played 131 tests, Richard Hadlee 86 tests and Glenn McGrath 124 tests -all with highly repeatable and efficient actions.

Kapil Dev’s durability was even more remarkable: he played 131 Tests across a 16-year career. Had he not been dropped for disciplinary reasons after his 1984 altercation with Sunil Gavaskar, he might also have established one of Test cricket’s longest uninterrupted runs of appearances – a real tribute to his physical fitness and easy classical action.

Here, James Anderson offers the clearest modern example: 188 Tests, 704 wickets and international cricket until age 41. Their careers suggest instead that repeatability and economy of movement may help a bowler preserve the body’s capacity to repeat the same action for years.

Action in motion

Being a classicist at heart, I would say that there is a deeper pleasure in watching the classical action in motion. A sling delivery may look like a magic trick: brilliant once, twice, or for an entire spell. But a McGrath or Anderson spell is closer to craftsmanship—precision repeated over decades.

Beyond the bias, there is biomechanics at play; and it explains why caution is warranted. Research associated with Bruce Elliott and other cricket-biomechanics scholars has linked mixed actions—where the hips and shoulders are misaligned or rotate out of sequence—with increased lumbar loading and stress-fracture risk.

In media-reported analysis of Jasprit Bumrah’s action, Deakin University’s Simon Feros identified lateral trunk flexion beyond roughly 45 degrees on some deliveries as a potential source of lumbar stress.

Agreed that this should be treated as an individual bio-mechanical assessment, not a universal injury threshold or proof that the angle caused Bumrah’s back problems, but it is also a valid caution for young bowlers attempting to copy such extreme releases without proper supervision.

My headline – “Why Sri Lankan bowlers should embrace classical mechanics” – by no means follows the Betteridge’s Law. Indeed, the larger goal for the emerging Sri Lankan fast bowling talent should be to manage it intelligently: preserve the thrill while acknowledging that unusual mechanics may require careful workloads, rehabilitation and recovery.

Hopefully, Mithali Ayodhya’s emergence and further career would make that lesson a live test for the next generation.

By Sreevalsan M

If you spotted a mistake or have feedback on this story, write to us at editor@newsassociate.com. Email us your press releases on the same ID.